tictech: Copyright and the rights of teachers and students

From: Graham Ford (fordgj@u.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 23:06:46 PST

  • Next message: Coon, Brian: "RE: tictech: Copyright and the rights of teachers and students"

    -tictech message:

    The other day at the ET meeting there was discussion of the use of
    commercially distributed music in a first grade science project. What
    struck me was the concern expressed at the use of the music in such a
    project. I don't believe that there is any legal basis for teachers or
    students to seek permission for such use as long as the final product will
    not be sold. This is based upon my own research and experience, and
    discussions I have had with other educators. In particular, I discussed the
    matter with an old teacher of mine who has taught a video production class
    for about twenty years. The show is called ONN, Olympia News Network. Here
    is a quote from my teacher:

    > łOne reason why I've always shied away from doing any
    > sort of selling of ONNs or a video annual, etc. is that I would want to
    use
    > music that kids currently relate to, and I wouldn't be able to use any
    music
    > except self composed and played, or music sold for license-free for profit
    > productions.˛

    ONN is broadcast weekly on public access television in Thurston County.
    Additionally, it is available on the Internet at
    http://kids.osd.wednet.edu/ohs/ (at least, it will be when I get down there
    to fix their streaming server).

    I think that a lot of our concerns are based upon the scare tactics used by
    the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) and MPAA (Motion
    Picture Association of America), which currently seek to impose morality
    using Digital Rights Management and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
    The problem is, if we can't copy music for illegally, then we can't copy
    music for legal purposes; the consequence is the subversion of our rights.

    Here is section 107 of Chapter 1 of Title 17 of the US Code:

    > § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
    >
    > Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a
    > copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or
    phonorecords
    > or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as
    > criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies
    for
    > classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of
    copyright.
    > In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a
    fair
    > use the factors to be considered shall include-
    >
    > (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of
    a
    > commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
    >
    > (2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
    >
    > (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the
    > copyrighted work as a whole; and
    >
    > (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the
    > copyrighted work.
    >
    > The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair
    use
    > if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

    (http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107)

    Number 3 above differentiates between downloading from a peer-to-peer
    services such as Napster and using a U2 song in the soundtrack for a high
    school news show. The first graders' project used only small portions of
    the music. Moreover, it is obvious that distribution of their work is not
    going to affect the market value of the music it uses.

    Admittedly, the laws are complicated and I am no lawyer, but this has been
    addressed by other educational institutions. Here are some examples of
    guidelines written by/for higher education:

    Stanford University Libraries:
    http://www-sul.stanford.edu/cpyright.html
    http://fairuse.stanford.edu/

    Consortium for Educational Technology for University Systems:
    http://www.cetus.org/fairindex.html

    Another good source is the Electronic Frontier Foundation:
    http://www.eff.org/IP/eff_fair_use_faq.html
    http://www.eff.org/cafe/gross1.html

    In reading the above sources, it becomes clear that as long as certain
    standards are met, fair use applies. Have your students cite the work just
    as they would in a bibliography. I think that this is a good lesson for
    students. So often we are encouraged to make sure our students know that
    copying music is illegal, but they should understand rights of the public
    and the freedoms they are granted. The RIAA and MPAA would have us believe
    otherwise, but copyright law swings both ways. I know that I am more aware
    of my rights because my teacher talked to me about it.

    Regards,
    Graham Ford

    Network Administrator
    Highland Park Elementary
    gjford@seattleschools.org

    -end tictech message. To join, leave, or visit
    the message archive, go to tictech on the Web:
    http://www.earthdaybags.org/tictech/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 06:34:05 PST


    Learning Space Development Server
    This page under development for The Learning Space
    Copyright ©1996-2000 by the Authors - All Rights Reserved
    Unauthorized use prohibited.
    This site was whacked using the TRIAL version of WebWhacker. This message does not appear on a licensed copy of WebWhacker.