RE: tictech: DWA comments

From: Fisher, Devin (dmfisher@seattleschools.org)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:21:23 PST

  • Next message: Graham Ford: "Re: tictech: DWA comments"

    -tictech message:

    I'm not a teacher, but I do understand some of the problems with how
    technology (everyone must remember paper and pencils are technology, albeit
    somewhat of an old technology) is adapted for use in the classroom. If I
    remember correctly, the point of having education is to make our children
    responsible and learned adults and prepare them for what some call "The Real
    World": that is life outside of a controlled learning environment. With that
    in mind, the question arises of why spell checking is not able to be used.
    There are very, very few math tests in which a simple calculator can not be
    used, and generally that is up to the instructor. I can't remember the last
    time I was not allowed to use a calculator in "The Real World".

    Sorry, but when I am trying to figure out 38.7 / 238.9223 I'm going to
    require the use of a calculator. When I spell "obsequious" I'm going to want
    to check it for correctness. Why can I only check it in a dictionary? They
    don't require me to use an abacus when I can't use a calculator, no one is
    that asinine.

    Devin Fisher
    Technology Consultant
    Van Asselt Elementary
    dmfisher@seattleschools.org

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Crozier, Kevin
    Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:16 PM
    To: tictech@learningspace.org
    Subject: tictech: DWA comments

    -tictech message:

    Mark,

    I too was once angry at the mismatch of skills taught in my classroom and
    skills assessed by district tests.

    I tried adapting to the CBA, DWA, etc. needs/demands but felt wrong inside.
    This was especially so in the timing of when I wanted to teach a skill
    within a unit of learning and when that skill "should" be taught in the
    school year for best "results".

    These days, I am confident that the powers to be aren't keeping up with the
    learning of today's students nor allowing teachers to create optimum
    learning opportunities via their own creative lessons (because of the
    pressure to "optimize" the students to perform their best on the scheduled
    tests).

    With that, I teach what I think is best in the ways that I think are best.
    When assessments arrive at the office, I use that as a learning opportunity
    for the students and parents. I explain that what is asked in the tests does
    not accurately measure what is learned by their children. For example, in
    this DWA, we did write by hand and correct spelling by dictionaries, a new
    event for some. But as in real life, we do our best when not given a choice
    . . . then move on to true, natural, student-centered learning unrestrained
    by the boundaries of the materials in or the processes of standardized
    tests.

    I once supported "standards", now I think their over-emphasis is destroying
    joyful learning and teaching. Ignore those leaders who now worship them.

    Kevin

    Kevin Crozier
    Gr. 3 - Lowell School
    Seattle, WA
    kbcrozier@seattleschools.org
    http://www.seattleschools.org/schools/lowell/kevin/index.htm
            "Understand the conflict with your brain, but solve it in your heart." -
    Erin Jones

    -end tictech message. To join, leave, or visit
    the message archive, go to tictech on the Web:
    http://www.earthdaybags.org/tictech/

    -end tictech message. To join, leave, or visit
    the message archive, go to tictech on the Web:
    http://www.earthdaybags.org/tictech/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:37:46 PST


    Learning Space Development Server
    This page under development for The Learning Space
    Copyright ©1996-2000 by the Authors - All Rights Reserved
    Unauthorized use prohibited.
    This site was whacked using the TRIAL version of WebWhacker. This message does not appear on a licensed copy of WebWhacker.