|
Copyright © 1997, Louis Schmier and Atwood Publishing.
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 11:03:59 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Random Thought: Teaching IS Love
Cold. Cold. Cold. Brrrrrr! It is, however, a civilized cold.
Only 23 degrees, not like in Baltimore where I was Friday and the wind
chill was a savage and windy 25 degrees below zero! Though bundled up in
walking grubbies that doubled my weight, the real protecting antifreeze
this morning were very warm thoughts about a very rewarding conference of
the community college teachers in Maryland which I attended at the end of
last week and where I gave the conference's keynote address, "The Humanity
of Teaching." It was one of those unexpectedly fulfilling conferences
where several hundred community college faculty had enthusiastically
gathered for a two day "teach-in" about teaching. None I met had come to
promote themselves or merely to add a line to their professional resume.
These dedicated people, persevering in the face of administrative and
political and budgetary obstacles I at times found hard to imagine here at
VSU, take their teaching seriously. Most importantly, they appreciate and
value their students. They were focused, energetic, resolved to better
themselves so that their students would be better educated to have
productive careers and live noble lives. In workshops, they gathered to
teach, to listen, to exchange, to ask, to answer, to learn. In clusters
and pairs, meandering around halls, sitting at tables and snacking,
standing around and sipping coffee, they quietly shared their ideas and
experiences and travails. They didn't talk research and publications,
they talked people. They didn't flaunt their resumes, they broadcasted
their the joy and satisfaction that they receive from generously being
committed to their students. You could easily sense the hunger and thirst
to seize opportunities to talk with colleagues from around the state about
teaching. You could see their flexibility and how they were on the watch
for opportunities for improvement; how so many had the courage to risk
something new, having faith in their capabilities to bring it off with
success. All the people I met and with whom I talked were authentic and
demanded nothing less of me. I've never been at a conference where the
participants laid a trap for me that I unknowingly walked into--or for
anyone else for that matter-- to see if there was a contradiction between
my espoused values and my behavior. "We just wanted to check out if you
were really real," one of them laughed. When it comes to "walking" that
all important mission of teaching in higher education, of being dedicated
to students, of giving generously themselves, most of these good people
could teach us in the colleges and universities more than a thing or two.
It was one of those rare conferences from which I think I received more
than I gave. I wish I could thank them all, each one of them, for
graciously welcoming me and taking me into their fold, for I know that I
left a better teacher and person.
It was during one of these coffee and danish clutches that a
professor from Chesapeake Community College asked me what I thought was
the first principle of teaching. "I don't know what THE first principle
of teaching is," I told him, "but I know what mine is and where to find
it." I went on to say that my first principle of teaching is so
deceptively simple and yet so mysterious. You won't find it in a textbook
of any discipline or in a laboratory test tube or on a library shelf or in
a computer program. You'll only find it within each of ourselves, where
it should be since teaching begins from within.
I told him, and later others, that my first principle of teaching is:
Teaching is love. Those three words have been profoundly transforming on
my self-perception, my perception of others, my sense of the value of
teaching, my understanding of my craft's mission, and my actions. During
the last six years, as love appeared on my list of teaching principles and
as it climbed up that list and went into the top ten and finally has
emerged as number one, I increasingly saw myself with teary-eyed surprise.
It has opened my eyes, unlocked my heart, fired my energy, raised my
spirits, freed my soul--first about myself and then about others-- and
warmed the classroom. It now drives me to be whomever I am supposed to be
and do whatever I must do.
Love is not something to snicker about or dismiss, or even to be
uncomfortable with. When you strip away all the opaque layers of
educational varnish and academic paint of methodology, pedagogy,
technology, philosophy, test scores, class grades, GPAs, lesson plans,
administrative memos, chains of command, politics, budgets, and at times
theology, and get down to the bare wood of teaching, the plain and natural
grain of love shines forth in all of its wonder and beauty.
Now, when I say, "teaching is love," I don't mean ardently embracing
my subject or tightly hugging to my cheek the stuff in print or having a
passion to be in the classroom or having a fire for learning or having an
excitement for ideas or having a fervent commitment to a particular
method, technology, and philosophy. When I say "teaching is love," I mean
the kind of habit of the heart that intoxicates me with students; I mean
the habit of the spirit that holds up every individual student before me
as a unique, miraculous, and sacred creation; I mean the habit of mind
that proclaims that every student is important and valuable. When I say
"teaching is love," I'm talking about the wellspring of my respect for,
valuing of, caring about, and concern for each student so that I enter
each classroom each day as a practioner of inclusion rather than
exclusion.
To say that teaching is love is to believe in the best of people, in
their unique potential, and to never stop finding ways to get each of them
to believe. To inseparably connect teaching and love is to insure that
every moment I teach is a moment, that teaching a sensation rather than a
performance. To talk of love is to get fired up about people and get them
to light the fires within themselves. To talk of love requires that I
respect each student, that I assume a responsibility for the well-being
and success of each student, that I value each student--and I never want
to lose something of value. Love will not allow me to give up the fight
for each studentūs right to succeed. It gives me strength to help students
discover their strengths. It rushes me into illumination, struggling to
turn what is too often a darkening, foreboding, painful, boring dungeon of
a classroom into a lighted, enjoyable, exciting, uplifting cathedral of
the spirit. To talk of love in the same breath with teaching is to make
the classroom into an inviting oasis where I welcome--and at time,
lure--all to come to nourish their souls, spirits, and minds. To talk of
love in the same breath as teaching is to talk of constant newness, daily
discovery and creation, with all of its dazzling color and splendor.
To be sure, I am an academician. I am an educator. I am an
intellectual. I am a scholar. I am a man of books and ideas. I make no
apologies for that. But, if I am not first and lastly a person who loves
other people, if I am not a standard-bearer holding high the banner for
humanity, I am nothing and what I do matters little. To say that teaching
is love requires I look at each student with awe and wonder and never lets
me stop for any reason to get all students to awe and wonder about
themselves; it requires that I never let any student go nameless,
faceless, hide in the shadows, be alone in the crowd; it demands I dream
about each student and never let's anything stop me from trying to get
each of them to dream about themselves; love is believing that each
student is a treasure chest of breathtaking "yeses!" and awesome"wows!"
and incredible "ooohs" and amazing "aaahs", and doing whatever it takes to
help them unlock that chest, lift open the lid, peer into the rich
contents, and reach into to grab hold of that prize cache.
I find that love is the cause of more miracles than is method and
technology; it is the source of more successes than grades and test
scores and honors; it is more infectious than is the intellect. It,
rushes into the lungs, flows in the veins, gets down into the bones,
enters lives, and touches the soul. When we truly live love--not just
mouth it--as the first principle of teaching in the classroom, the chance
of what we say and do has a better chance of taking root and staying; when
we truly live love as the first principle in the classroom the chance of
what we touch has a better chance of sticking.
As the letters from Patrick and Trudy--and Sandra now that I think
about it--show, the power of love doesn't abate; it's influence never
stops. Like the pink Ever-ready bunny, it keeps going on and on and on
and on. It keeps echoing and reverberating in students' hearts--it keeps
shouting an awakening "Boo" in their souls and minds--long after the
sounds of a lecture have died away and the print on test scores has faded
out.
Teaching IS love. Without it my classroom would be as cold and
stiffening as those icebox outside--as it once was. It is that simple.
And yet, it is not that plain. Like the beautiful grain of exposed wood,
it is that humanly magnificent and that humanly complex.
|
|